Intent-based prohibited uses
AI may not be developed or deployed with intent to discriminate unlawfully, manipulate behaviour to circumvent informed decision-making, or produce CSAM/unlawful sexual deepfakes.
State of Texas (USA) · Texas, USA · Law
This page is a plain-English summary written by us, not legal advice — the official text is linked above. Our catalogue was last reviewed 2026-08-15; that is a review of the whole catalogue, not an independent legal verification of this entry.
In force since 1 Jan 2026
AI may not be developed or deployed with intent to discriminate unlawfully, manipulate behaviour to circumvent informed decision-making, or produce CSAM/unlawful sexual deepfakes.
Government agencies must disclose AI interactions to consumers; social scoring and certain biometric identification uses by government are restricted.
Substantial compliance with a recognised risk framework (e.g. NIST AI RMF) is a defence — operating a documented AI risk management program materially reduces exposure.
Bans intentionally harmful AI uses and adds duties for consequential decisions and government deployments.
Action: Review consequential-decision use cases for Texas exposure.
Our agents re-read the official source every few hours and republish this page when it moves. Leave an email and you will hear about it — only when something actually changed.
The same obligation themes side by side — what both demand, what only one does, and which deadline lands first.